Report Details How Urban Districts Are Building Equity-Centered Principal Pipelines

Eight districts show how to move from abstract commitments to tangible systems

A recent report from The Wallace Foundation highlights how eight large urban school districts are redesigning their leadership pipelines to prepare and sustain equity-centered school principals.

The report, Promising Practices for the Design and Implementation of Equity-Centered Leader Pathways: Moving From Abstract Commitments to Tangible Systems, documents the early years of the Foundation’s six-year Equity-Centered Pipeline Initiative (ECPI), launched in 2021. Researchers examined how districts translated equity commitments into concrete systems, structures, and daily practices .

Participating districts include:

  • Baltimore City Public Schools

  • Columbus City Schools

  • District of Columbia Public Schools

  • Fresno Unified School District

  • Jefferson County Public Schools

  • Portland Public Schools

  • San Antonio Independent School District

  • Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools

Researchers documented districts’ early goals, actions, and decisions through interviews, focus groups, observations, and document review . The study focused not only on program design, but on how systems were aligned—or redesigned—to support equity-centered leadership at scale.

The report builds on earlier Wallace-supported research showing that well-designed principal pipelines can be an affordable and effective strategy for improving schools . Strong school leaders are associated with improved student achievement, attendance, instructional quality, and school climate.

Across districts, three major themes emerged:

1. Treating challenges as “opportunities for design.”
Rather than viewing obstacles as barriers, district leaders used reflection and feedback to redesign structures and routines to better advance equity-centered leadership .

2. Creating coherence across systems.
Promising practices gained traction when districts aligned departments, roles, and external partners around a shared vision for equity-centered leadership. Coherence was both a persistent challenge and a central accomplishment .

3. Prioritizing relationships and human capital.
District-led academies, affinity groups, leadership shadowing, and supervisor development were designed to build distributed leadership and local ownership of equity efforts .

Baltimore City Public Schools developed a one-year, home-grown principal residency program tailored to the district’s context. The program emerged from a comprehensive landscape analysis and feedback from district leaders and includes:

  • Job-embedded leadership development

  • Monthly professional learning seminars

  • On-demand coaching

  • Context-specific preparation aligned to Baltimore schools

The residency reflects the report’s central finding: meaningful equity work requires building durable systems, not isolated programs.

Across districts, researchers identified six promising practices emerging from the multiyear effort :

  1. Developing internal principal residency programs

  2. Expanding district–university collaboration beyond traditional preparation

  3. Engaging community members in principal selection

  4. Establishing and sustaining affinity groups for aspiring school leaders

  5. Focusing principal supervisors explicitly on equity

  6. Revising district policies to prioritize equity-centered leadership and long-term sustainability

For example, Columbus City Schools developed a Portrait of an Equity-Centered Leader to guide preparation and ongoing professional learning, in partnership with The Ohio State University. Meanwhile, Fresno Unified School Districtestablished leadership affinity groups to recruit, mentor, and retain principals and assistant principals of color.

The report emphasizes that sustaining equity-centered leadership requires more than policy alignment. It requires shifts in culture—particularly in the everyday interactions between educators, students, and families .

As the report concludes, progress toward systemic preparation and support of equity-centered leaders “is not only possible—it is already under way.” The districts featured demonstrate how to move from abstract equity commitments to tangible systems that expand opportunity for all students .

For the full report, visit: https://bit.ly/4qcFpaR